My Photo

Join Coca-Cola Campaign Google Group

Bookmarks

Licence

  • Creative Commons License
    The contents of this blog are licenced under a Creative Commons Licence. Details>>.

Entries categorized "Rural"

Using Coca Cola's Distribution Muscle

Coca Cola Distribution in Dakar Coca Cola in Soweto

Photo credits: Right: Nick Gripton Left: Marie-II

Today, via a tweet, I was invited by Number 10 to join a live blog of the Business Call To Action event. As the commentary scrolled by, Coca Cola made a statement and it reminded me of an idea that first came to me some 20 years ago, as I drove through the bush in NE Zambia in an area where one in five children die before the age five, usually from dehydration. This was in the days before blogs when it was difficult to know where to park such random thoughts.

This is what I typed in to today's live blog:

[Comment From Simon Berry]
What about Coca Cola using their distribution channels (which are amazing in developing countries) to distribute rehydration salts? Maybe by dedicating one compartment in every 10 crates as 'the life saving' compartment?

I still think it's a good idea. Coca Cola, are you listening?

Further information

All of the Coca Cola Campaign posts

I'm thankful to the photographers who have allowed me (through personal contact or Creative Commons Licensing) to use their photos.

Calling Jack Thurston

QuestionmarkThis is an experiment in online social networking. If you are Jack Thurston of 'The Bike Show from Resonance FM' fame please leave a comment.

It's also an interesting case study, particularly for those who are struggling to figure this stuff out and grasp the relevance of it for them or their organisations.

The hypothesis behind this experiment is that social networking is a powerful tool and is very effective at joining people up with similar interests even though they are 'doing their own thing in their own way in their own (online) places'.

A comment from Jack on this diary post will help confirm this hypothsis. Let's see what happens.

Why Jack?
Last night I was listening to a podcast by Jon Winston from Bikescape using iTunes. Coincidentally, I had the Last.FM program running. This told me that 323 Last.FM users had also listened to this podcast while running Last.FM. It told me that it knew nothing about the 'artist' (Jon Winston). It also told me that there were two 'Similar artists': Jack Thurston and Scott Alumbaugh.

Last.FM knows nothing about Jack Thurston either, so I do a Google search and find his blog. At this point I realise that I have come across Jack before. He also does a podcast with a cycling theme*.

I read on and realise that we don't just share an interest in cycling but there is also a rural thread in common. I then remember that my colleague, Paul Henderson, highlighted one of Jack's projects to me about two week's ago: www.farmsubsidy.org This amazing (and very clever) project uses modern law (freedom of information) and technology to bring together data on farm subsidies. It shows who gets what. David Henke of the Guardian wrote about here.

And finally, I see that Jack has a general interest in technology and attended the 'BarCamp' that many of the people who got involved in the Open Innovation Exchange went to.

The chances are that Jack will find this post because he (or someone who knows him) will have his/her RSS Reader set up to scan for people writing about The Bike Show or farmsubsidy.org

Anyway, if Jack does comment here, it will demonstrate that the latest internet technology joins people up even though they don't know each other and they are operating in different places. Will it work... how long will it take...? As the saying goes, watch this space.

Previous entries:

Thoughts on the new ruralnet|online - Part 1 (of many!)

* Listen to Jack's account of the Dunwick Dynamo if you're into intersting cycling challenges

Co-design process gathers pace

Ruralnetonline2Thanks to the generosity of many, the ruralnet|online co-design exercise is gathering steam over here. Please join in if you can, just visit to pick up insights for your own projects.

Here are some recent exchanges

The feature list!

What is ruralnet|online for?

This web 2.0 malarky really does work well

Thanks James and David

ruralnet|online co-design process launched!

ruralnet|online co-design website

Following a lot of frantic activity over the last week, yesterday saw the launch of the first step towards the re-design of ruralnet|online - a mechanism to involve our users, past, present and potential, in the whole re-design process. Please get involved over here: www.ruralnetonline.org.uk.

Why should you get involved? What's in it for you? How can you engage?

You can 'engage' as an anonymous browser. We are putting all our ideas up in the open and some of these ideas have been informed by some of the best brains in the internet world. So at the very least the content will be interesting and you might learn something which could help you.

You can comment anonymously. If you think we are barking up the wrong tree, please tell us! If you have an insight, we'd like to hear that too.

You can register (it only takes a couple of minutes and it's free) and when you do you get your own blog to write whatever you like. When you're logged in your comments get attributed to you too.

Some of the highlights on ruralnet|online so far:

- Adding value to networks and services - automatically
- how net:gain helped with the re-alignment of our ICT Strategy
- the ruralnet|uk communications strategy
- an ICT Strategy on a single page
- ideas on what forums (communities of interest/practice) might look like in the future

Please consider getting involved >>

Planning for the next generation ruralnet|online

Flowchart1The planning for the development and launch of the next generation of ruralnet|online got off to a solid start this week using flipchart paper and post-it notes. Not a bit of IT in sight!

Our objective is to involve users, past, present and future, and the best brains in the Web 2.0 business, in the co-creation of ruralnet|online 2.0 and launch it to coincide with ruralnet|online's 10th birthday on 10 April at our collaborate|2008 event.

We will be seeking to set up a focus group to meet face-to-face twice during this period and we will also be running an open consultation/ideas exchange online. We will model this on the Open innovation Exchange which brought me into contact with some fantastic innovators last year. We will work at pace and with a clear set of goals - just like before. We will seed this with a few ideas and concepts including these that have already been posted elsewhere:

- Ed Mitchell's Three types of community
- Email's broke . . . and it ain't worth fixing
- Turning process into content
- Google Apps for Farmers
- Communities of Practice and Web 2.0
- Thoughts on the new ruralnet|online - Part 1 (of many!)
- Call Sign - Blog Sign?
- Turning the telescope the other way around
- Jane Berry's Spiral of Engagement

We heard today that David Wilcox is available to help us out on this mission both online and offline. More details over the next few days.

ruralnet|online will soon be 10

RnonlinecolourAbout this time 10 years ago I was loading £8,000-worth of IBM RAID server into the car to take it back to work after the Christmas break. The server had FirstClass installed on it and had been set up on a trestle table in our bedroom. Over the holiday period I'd been grabbing short moments to teach myself how to administer the 'FirstClass Intranet Server' that was to sit at the heart of the ruralnet|online service. ruralnet (as it was referred to then) was launched in March 1998.

The server had 4 modems attached to it so people could dial in to use it. It was also connected to the internet from a small 'office' in Atherstone, North Warwickshire, so people could connect that way too. However, in those days you had to pay £120 a year for a dial up internet connection and then you had call charges on top of that. Freeserve was just around the corner.

Since the launch we have run an uninterrupted extranet service to our users that has included a telephone helpline. I think this is a record for the UK voluntary sector. Any challengers?

The launch of ruralnet|online was the culmination of 18 months of market research, business planning and fund raising. A funding bid to the Big Lottery (then the National Lottery Charities Board) had been rejected and we were not allowed to ask why. But funding for the ICT elements of the project was forthcoming from the IBM Trust and was provided through the Communities Online initiative which my friend David Wilcox co-founded. ACRE also invested £3,000 and in exchange we put all of the Rural Community Councils online. At least in theory. Remember that this was at a time when people in Cornwall and elsewhere were telling us that "email will never catch on here".

Even at that time we were anxious about the software platform we had chosen: FirstClass. Every two or three years since the launch, systems would come along and the doom merchants would say that these "would blow us out of the water". We looked at these but stuck with FirstClass and were reassured that the Open University did too. What the doom merchants didn't realise is that there is a lot more to running an online system than the technology.

The ongoing review of alternative ways of delivering our online services has continued and, two years ago, with the emergence of the 2nd Generation of web tools (aka Web 2.0) we decided that we needed to diversify our technical platform. We are still offering FirstClass-based services to those who need an easy to use group working system with integrated email, forums, calendars etc but we've successfully migrated many of services onto Web 2.0 platforms.

In March this year, to coincide with ruralnet|online's 10th Birthday, we will be launching ruralnet|online 2.0, a completely re-engineered system with all the tried a tested services in place, like Experts Online, whirring away on Web 2.0 technology.

What will this look like? How will it work? What services will be included? Well that will be up to you. An open consultation on all these issues will be launched shortly. Watch this space.

The trouble with rural broadband

Southwithambook

It is inconceivable to think now that just 5 years ago rural Britain faced the prospect of no access to broadband. The visionaries of the time, who mostly ended up playing an active part in the Community Broadband Network (established by ruralnet|uk and The Phone Co-op) and the Access to Broadband Campaign (ABC), could see that this would be a complete disaster for rural areas. They were right weren’t they? Anyone disagree? I thought not.

With the internet becoming a major delivery channel for nearly everything, including Government and other public services, how would the Government have coped with a group of people equivalent in size to a major city who were excluded from such services?

But it’s OK now. Virtually everyone has access to broadband. Or do they?

The trouble with broadband is that it is a rapidly evolving technology. It’s not like electricity or gas. Supply people with that and they’ve got it for life. With broadband, today’s broadband is tomorrow’s narrowband.

When I was project manager of the WREN Telecottage in the early 90s we were a trial site for ISDN and when the internet arrived and we hooked up an ISDN router, we thought we’d died and gone to heaven! Web pages loaded in an instant, just as fast, it seemed, as the stuff from our own server located 6 feet away. But you try ISDN today. You’d be VERY disappointed. Things have moved on.

We have a situation a bit like the deadly tryst that exists between hardware and software producers – faster machines beget more demanding software which demands faster hardware and so it goes on. In the same way, as ‘broadband’ gets faster so online service providers produce services which demand faster broadband speeds.

So what should happen in rural areas when the ADSL systems they have been provided with prove totally inadequate? Should organisations like the Regional Development Agencies meddle in the market again and fill in with whatever the next generation of broadband is? I don’t think so.

The trouble with ‘market meddling’ is that is screws things up. All those rural communities who have been provided with ADSL in places where there was market failure are probably stuck with it for sometime as those who have invested will need to see a return on their investment, and that takes time.

So, should we just leave these rural communities to miss out the THE economic and social development driver of our time? No we shouldn’t and we should meddle in the market again but this time we need to do it properly and give these communities a lot more than the market is prepared to deliver at the time.

I think I am right in saying that a system of ‘fibre to the street’ (or village centre) and very very high speed wireless links from there is about as good as it can get, as far as broad band is concerned, for the foreseeable future.

So next time we meddle in the market let’s not do it reluctantly. Let’s do it with real enthusiasm and properly.

Related information:

See also:

Rethinking the future for rural service delivery


  Crudwell Post Office 
  Originally uploaded by S1m0nB3rry

This is the Executive Summary of an original vision created to inform the work of the Labour Group of Rural MPs in 1998. The vision was updated and presented at the ruralnet|2004 conference. It has been presented at many conferences since.

Executive Summary
Access to services is crucial to reduce rural deprivation and increase social inclusion. However, access to services for rural people has been declining for many years and will continue to do so unless we inject new thinking and start doing things differently. We need new paradigms for rural service delivery that focus more on the integrated needs of service users and less on the 'needs' of service suppliers.

The idea of 'multi-purpose village centres' was first published in 1981. Since then there are many more post offices in shops but true multi-service outlets (MSOs) are so rare that they still make the headlines.

It is argued that a sole focus on location for the delivery of services is not helpful and that the current way of measuring access in terms of the distance from locations needs to be reviewed. The focus should be on 'Integrated Service Provision' and not on 'Multi-Service Outlets'.

At the heart of the vision presented is the notion that successful service integration needs to be preceded by an analysis of the component parts of each service. Then services can be re-engineered and integrated. This can be done by considering the functions a service performs under the following headings:

  1. information function
  2. expert function
  3. social function
  4. physical function

Examples of this analysis are given in the full paper and applied to a whole range of services.
Analysing services in this way before integration, enables us to identify two things:

  1. The elements of the service that need LOCAL physical space (the physical elements and some of the social elements);
  2. The elements of the service that can be delivered without a local physical presence using the telephone and ICT (ie the expert and information elements and some of the social elements).

Only the physical and some of the social elements of a service need a local venue. The expert and information elements can be delivered remotely (to the local venue or to the home or business) using ICT. In simple terms, experts can sit anywhere on the end of a phone and information can be delivered using internet-based technology. A local advocate operating from a local venue could act as an intermediary to such services where required.
NHS Direct and the way the delivery of library services has changed over recent years are used in the full paper to demonstrate these principles in practice.

The paper emphasises, that despite the fact that ICT is influencing service delivery, local, physical locations are still required and will always be required to deliver the physical elements of the various services. For financial reasons and for the benefit of service users, these should be co-located in multi-service outlets.

Various forms of co-location are considered in the full paper.

A remaining significant challenge is the integration of services for the benefit of end users. NHS Direct, innovative though it is, has still to be integrated with the rest of the NHS let alone services from other sectors.

The rare examples of true service integration are generally driven by those who need the services and not by those who supply them. They require true partnership working across sectors and this, more often than not, is managed by the voluntary and community sector (VCS). The VCS has a key role in the integration of services for the benefit of service users in rural areas.

Download the full version of this paper (PDF Format, 2.15 MB).
Download the slides used in the presentation (PPT Format, 4.33 MB).

Track changes on this Blog

  • Using an RSS Reader . . .
  • Or using Email . . .

    Enter your email address:

    New posts will be sent to you by FeedBurner

Nominated

  • nominated for the New Media Awards - 2008

Participation Ride blog 2006

Stats